On the path to more sustainable product design (part one)

 
 
 
 

Material Choices

“Material Choices” is the first part of an upcoming two-part series.

The linear economy, defined by the “take-make-waste” model, has proven to be a highly dysfunctional system at both a social and environmental level. Again and again, things are not built to last.

From a linear to a circular economy. Based on Circular Flanders.

Instead, they often are thrown away after one (short) usage - even the most meticulously designed ones. Alas, designers have been, and continue to be, perpetrators of the linear economy and its detrimental consequences.

Luckily, as a radical transformation of how we produce, consume and reuse goods gets increasingly urgent, designers can play an integral part in facilitating such systemic change.

But how to balance the quality of a product while minimising its impact on the planet?

It is challenging to create something that looks good, works well, lasts a lifetime, will not turn into waste and is beneficial for the environment and society. In product design, that often comes down to better material choices - as material efficiency can reduce raw material extraction, biodiversity loss, and CO2 emissions. Sustainable materials have become a hot topic and an industry in continuous development - think of biomaterials, for instance. And, as designers, we have a greater responsibility.

To help guide more sustainable design choices, in this article, we share some examples of categories of “better” materials that could inform your next product.

Note: More is to be said and done. We are only scratching the surface here. The goal is to bring the subject to light and ensure we, as designers, pay attention to these choices early in the design process.

 

“Better” Materials

Recyclable and recycled materials

Smile Plastics - 100% recycled and 100% recyclable plastic. From FROLIC studio Award-winning materials.

Recyclable materials - such as glass, paper and aluminium - can be reprocessed into the same (recycled) material and used again (and again). The recycling process, however, decreases the original quality of many materials and, due to faulty recycling systems, also their quantity.

Despite the benefits recycling brings, it keeps our economy dangerously dependent on the extraction of non-renewable materials. Moreover, products are not kept in circulation as long as possible at their highest and best use.

Recyclable and recycled materials are only one part of a more extensive system to achieve and maintain better design choices in a circular economy.

 

Biomaterials

Nuatan - Made of 100% plant-based biopolymers PLA and PHB from plant-based resources such as corn starch and potato starch. Biodegradable in an industrial composter.

Biobased materials, or biomaterials, are made from natural renewable feedstocks. Think of wood, hemp, paper, cardboard, mycelium and some textile materials such as wool. They stand out against those commonly defined as synthetic materials, which are mainly manufactured from nonrenewable feedstocks (i.e., fossil fuels and minerals).

Moreover, the rise of sustainability in the industry agenda and concerns about greenhouse gas emissions have kickstarted the development of a whole new set of biomaterials, made, for instance, from seaweed, cactus, or all kinds of organic waste.

A series of synthetic biobased materials, such as polymers, fibres and lubricants, are also emerging. Think of bioplastics such as PLA and bio-PET, obtained from starchy foods like corn, sugar cane or sugar beets.

Note: Biobased materials save nonrenewable energy and can substitute nonrenewable fossil fuel- and mineral-based feedstocks. However, they may come at the cost of additional land use and related environmental impacts.

 

Biodegradable materials

Exploring cardboard as a biodegradable product material - From FROLIC studio upcoming project.

While biobased refers to the origin of a product’s materials, biodegradable refers to their end of life. Microorganisms break down biodegradable materials when provided with specific suitable conditions (e.g., temperature, oxygen, light, water).

Diverse materials take different amounts of time to be degraded. For example, if left in the environment, it would take vegetables 5-10 days to be degraded. Instead, a styrofoam cup or a plastic bag may need 500 years, or, at worst, indefinitely, to be fully broken down.

Does this mean that any material could be biodegradable? In theory, yes.

However, standards have been developed to properly assess material biodegradability to minimise confusion and avoid exploitation of the term and its implications. For instance, synthetic polymers are considered “resistant to biodegradation” due to their prolonged degradation process.

Note: As you read above, biobased and biodegradable are not synonymous. Biobased materials are often biodegradable, but this is only sometimes the case.

 

Compostable materials

Vattenfall fossil-free baby crib designed by FROLIC studio.

All compostable products are biodegradable, but not all biodegradable products are compostable.

Compostable materials fully decompose into a non-toxic natural substance that is not harmful to the environment and can often be used to improve soil health.

Some materials - like fruit and vegetable peels - can decompose in a home composter, but not all compostable materials are suitable. Some might require higher levels of heat, water, oxygen and microorganisms and, therefore, need to be broken down in an appropriate industrial environment - like most commercial compostable packaging.

Note: As you read above, all compostable items are biodegradable, but not all biodegradable products are compostable. The key difference is that broken-down compostable materials do not introduce any environmental toxicity.

 

Wrapping it up

Prioritising sustainability as early as possible in the design process will result in the most significant reduction of the impact of the end product. Hence, it is especially at this step that designers have the opportunity to make positive change happen.

Materials are one part of a more extensive system to achieve and maintain greater overall design choices in a circular economy. Thus, during the initial product design phases, moving away from a linear “take-make-waste” economic model in favour of circular development often means making “better” material choices. As a product design studio, it is part of our job to research, employ and advocate for materials that lead us towards more sustainable products and footprints.

Ensuring that the environmental impact of what we create is always considered from the very beginning is a challenging ambition - and even more when functionality and aesthetics are also a top priority. When looking for the right “better” material, there might always be a more suitable alternative that we did not know about, consequences and trade-offs we did not consider or adverse effects we could not avoid. An extremely high count of aspects and angles need to be taken into account.

The silver lining is that great companies and people are doing excellent groundwork in researching, innovating, developing and evaluating materials. Thus, ultimately helping us pursue our commitment on the path towards more sustainable product design.

Interested in reading more? Part Two is coming soon!

 


Explore more articles